
Every few months, the SEO community panics over rumors, algorithm updates, and changes in how Google displays search results. One of the latest debates revolves around a big question: “Is Google removing schema markup?” The short answer is No, Google is not killing schema.
Schema markup has always evolved, and yes, Google sometimes stops supporting certain types of structured data. But structured data itself is here to stay.In this blog, we will break down what is actually happening, whether we still need schema for SEO, and how to adapt for the future of search engine structured data.
Why Google Is Not Killing Schema (It Is Evolving)
Google has clarified multiple times that structured data helps search engines understand content. What is changing is how much value Google assigns to certain schema types, and which markups qualify for rich results.
Google may remove support for certain markups if:
- They are misused or spammed
- They do not improve user experience
- They do not align with search intent and AI-enhanced search
This is where the misconception begins. As soon as one schema type becomes unsupported, people assume Google is removing schema markup entirely, which is not true.
Do We Still Need Schema for SEO?
Absolutely, yes.
Even if Google reduces rich result eligibility for certain schema types, structured data remains crucial because it:
| Why Schema Still Matters | Benefits |
|---|---|
| Helps search engines understand your page | Better crawl and context |
| Enhances SERP appearance when eligible | Higher CTR and visibility |
| Supports AI Overviews and Knowledge Graph | Future-proofs content |
| Improves topical signals and EEAT context | Builds authority |
Schema markup strengthens your site’s semantic relevance. In a world shifting towards AI-powered search, clarity of meaning matters more than ever.
Why Schema Markup Still Matters for SEO in 2025 and Beyond
As AI Overviews, SGE, and deeper entity understanding become the core of search results, schema markup 2025 will be less about “getting rich snippets” and more about:
- Feeding knowledge graph entities
- Clarifying relationships between content pieces
- Supporting multimodal search (text, voice, visual)
- Enhancing topical authority with semantic signals
So, why schema markup still matters for SEO comes down to one simple truth:
Schema helps Google understand who you are, what your content means, and who it is for, not just what words are on the page.
Will Schema Markup Affect Rankings?
Google has repeatedly stated that schema is not a direct ranking factor, but it indirectly influences rankings through:
- Improved context leading to better topical relevance
- Rich results that increase CTR and user engagement
- Better understanding for AI Overviews
In short:
Schema will not magically jump your page to number 1, but without it, your content becomes harder for search engines to interpret, which affects long-term organic visibility.
Google Algorithm and Schema: What Is Changing?
Google’s algorithm is shifting from “keyword-based ranking” to entity-based understanding. Schema is the language that helps organize those entities.
Recent changes show Google’s focus on:
| Google’s Direction | Impact on Schema |
|---|---|
| AI and machine learning | Needs structured meaning |
| Entity-based search | Schema clarifies entities |
| Less reliance on HTML microdata | JSON-LD is preferred |
| Rich results eligibility updates | Quality over quantity |
Schema is not being killed. Low-value, spammed, or outdated schema types are being phased out.
Schema Markup Best Practices for 2025
To stay ahead, use schema strategically:
What to Do
- Use JSON-LD (Google’s recommended format)
- Mark up only visible and relevant content
- Validate using Rich Results Test and Schema.org Validator
- Implement entity-based schema such as Person, Organization, FAQ, HowTo, Product, Article
What to Avoid
- Do not add schema that does not match page content
- Avoid spammy FAQ or fake review schema
- Do not chase every schema type, focus on meaningful ones
The Future of Search Engine Structured Data
The future of schema is not about chasing rich snippets. It is about contextual meaning and entity mapping. Markups may come and go, but the core importance of structured data will remain.
If you are optimizing your website for long-term organic growth or looking for seo packages in pakistan, structured data should remain a fundamental part of your SEO strategy.
Final Thoughts
Google is not killing schema, it is refining it.
Schema markup will continue to evolve, and some markups may lose value over time, but structured data is here to stay. It will become even more important as search transforms into AI-driven, context-aware, and entity-based discovery.
If your SEO strategy relies only on old-style rich results, you will fall behind.
If your SEO strategy uses schema for meaning and entities, you will stay ahead.
FAQ
Is Google removing schema markup?
No, Google is not removing schema markup. It occasionally stops supporting certain types of schema that no longer add value, but structured data itself remains important for search understanding.
Do we still need schema for SEO?
Yes, schema is still necessary for SEO. It helps search engines understand your content, improves visibility, and can increase click-through rates even if rich results eligibility changes.
Why does schema markup still matter for SEO?
Schema markup still matters because it improves how Google interprets your content, supports AI Overviews, builds topical authority, and strengthens your site’s semantic relevance for better long-term SEO performance.
Will schema markup affect rankings?
Schema markup is not a direct ranking factor, but it can influence rankings indirectly by improving context, user engagement, and visibility through enhanced search features.
What is changing in the Google algorithm regarding schema?
Google’s algorithm is shifting towards entity-based understanding and AI-driven search. Schema now plays a bigger role in defining context, meaning, and relationships between entities rather than only generating rich snippets.


